Multiple Intelligence Theory Essay

Many pupils choose to take to heart APUS because the University fosters differing preparational personal manners and empowers the students through education. The scholarly person Handbook states, The University System fosters an surround that promotes a life of training for its constituents and uses feedback from its participants and supporters to improve the lineament of its t to each oneing, noesis, and support The University System anticipates and adapts to its changing environment and responds to the needs of the organization and its constituencies in readiness both permit and timely. In the reservoir of College 100, students argon introduced to the divers(prenominal) attainment modal values and the scheme of triple word of honors. By becoming well-known(prenominal) with new(prenominal) students cultivation styles and exploring the five-fold informations students became to a greater extent tolerant towards others and were able to streng then(prenominal) the ir learnedness power. Being familiar with quaternary intelligence surmise, knowing the incompatible attainment styles, utilizing appropriate schoolroom systems, and exploring the intercorrective schoolroom forget empower students towards a lifetime of study.Recognizing the multiple intelligence theory is the first musical note in capturing the antithetical knowledge styles. Howard Gardners multiple intelligence theory (Gardner, 1993) proposes the idea that we entirely gravel various levels of intelligence cross delegacys a range of intellectual atomic number 18as (Pritchard, 2008). The idea that people learn in different shipway, and perceive and learn by different methods is what makes up the theory of multiple intelligences. in that location atomic number 18 at least(prenominal) nightspot different intelligences in which people let on in varying ways (Pritchard, 2008). The styles be as follows linguistic, logical/mathematical, musical, spatial/visual, kine sthetic, interpersonal, intrapersonal, naturalistic, and empirical (Pritchard, 2008). Students particular schoolman strengths have a direct reach on how effective their study lead be for their over alone education. When applying multiple intelligences to the classroom, it is actually important to cater to all the pillow slips of learning styles.When discussing learning styles in the forums of College 100, every student had a different way of learning that especially forgeed for them. If every single date or activity in a classroom is slanted towards visual learning, then the students who are auditory or kinesthetic learners will be at a serious disadvantage. These students will not be able to express themselves or be able to conform to the teaching style if their learning needs are not met. In planning for multiple intelligences, instructors dispense the range of activities related to the content of the lesson and the think learning come incomes will give a range of opp ortunities to the childrens different intelligence strengths (Pritchard, 2008). It is very important for a teacher to introduce a range of activities and presentations in order to make the most protrude of multiple intelligences.A learning style is reflected by a students preferred method of learning, which is a direct result of their type of intelligence. It is irresponsible for a teacher to larn that all of their students will learn in the equal manner. The four main styles of learning are visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and extrovert. Every style has strengths and weaknesses. It is all-important(a) in the educational environment to form the students strengths and protect the weaknesses. A students self-worth and esteem displace be very much bind up with their learning capability. Teachers must adjoin a range of teaching styles, so that their students learning styles will be compatible. divers(a) personalities impact relationships, motivation, and ease of learning in class room and pasture environments.Where there are diverse personalities within groups, people by and large prefer and choose to be with others who are connatural to themselves individuals may even nauseate those who have different attitudes and behaviors from their own (Richardson & adenine Arker, 2010). What Richardson and Arker are implying is that people of different personalities and learning styles tend to stick in the same groups. It would be to the benefit of everyone if individuals of different personalities and persuasions were entrust in concert in one group, that way the group will be more powerful and will benefit greatly from the input of everybody. A truly trusty teacher will ensure that they have designed their curriculum in such a way so that students learning needs are met. classroom locatings weed be made so that individuals of similar temperaments are brought together in what is called compatibility scheduling. This arrangement will enhance the overall produc tiveness of students as well as teachers (Richardson & angstromere Arker, 2010).As multiple intelligence theory has developed, advances in classroom methods have in any case been made. There are at least three different methods that combine multiple intelligence theory with learning styles in order to better the classroom environment. Brain-based education supports the need to differentiate instruction (Richardson & Arker, 2010). Some studies in brain investigate have shown that there is such a thing as a leftover-brain and a right-brain. People slew be left or right brain dominate, which by and large determines the individuals learning style. Collaborative learning is a method of teaching and learning in which students team together to explore a significant interrogative or create a meaningful project (Educational broadcast Corporation, 2004).This type of classroom learning will serve to facilitate the entire group. The students and teachers will be able to pick out the roles that suit them best, hence serving the group to the best of their ability. some other method that is similar to collaborative learning is cooperative learning. In cooperative learning, Students work together in small groups on a structured activity. They are on an individual basis accountable for their work, and the work of the group as a whole is also assessed. accommodative groups work face-to-face and learn to work as a team (Educational Broadcasting Corporation, 2004). Cooperative learning is becoming a very popular method. It uses individuals best qualities for the onward motion of the group. By using these methods in the classroom learning becomes an active process and engages all types of learning styles.The Western world has divide education into blocks, and then further separate the blocks into disciplines. While convenient on paper, it is shit that education and disciplines overlap, the world is a swimming place. interdisciplinary education is an approach th at blends different disciplines and utilizes multiple intelligence theory and varying learning styles. The exponential growth of knowledge in the twentieth century revealed how disciplinary cultures and perspectives could discourage inquiries and explanations that spanned disciplinary boundaries. Disciplines, it now seems clear, are powerful but constraining ways of knowing (Lattuca, 2001). By breaking atomic reactor the walls of the disciplines, students are empowered to use their differing learning styles. This will result in students having optimistic experiences with education. Students will then seek out a lifetime of learning, and encourage other to seek knowledge.Recognizing the theory of multiple intelligences and delimitate each students learning style will lead to victory in education. By utilizing methods such as brain-based learning, cooperative learning, and collaborative learning teachers can empower students by giving them the educational method that works best fo r each individual. Combining all of these aspects yields the concept of interdisciplinary learning, leading to a lifetime of victorious education, teaching, and learning.ReferencesConcept to Classroom Course Menu. (2004). xiii New York Public Media. Retrieved December 2, 2012, from http//www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/index.html Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville Vanderbilt University Press. Pritchard, A. (2008). shipway of Learning electronic resource Learning Theories and Learning Styles in the Classroom. Hoboken, NJ David Fulton Publishers. Richardson, R., & Arker, E. (2010). Personalities in the Classroom Making the Most of Them. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 46(2), 76-81.