Humor in Task-Oriented Group Discussions :: Free Essay Writer

Robinson, Dawn T., Smith-Lovin, Lynn. (2001). Getting A Laugh Gender, Status, and Humor in Task Discussions*. Social Forces, 80, 123-158. punctuate and Purpose The general purpose of this interpret is to show how toughness operates in task-oriented collection discussions. The researchers utilise the opportunity to guide the dynamic occurence of wag during group conversations. The researchers are utilise the functions of humor to do it up with ideals about who it is that actually does the joking (male or female), and when and where this joking takes place. The shot suggests an image of joking as dealing with status in a society, the male sex, people who are very participatory and those that are habitual interrupters (or interrupted often themselves) to all show status-related patterns of humor use. The researchers further put on a theory that if they know about the guidance people engage in humor, then they will be able-bodied to predict who will do so, and in what envir onment or circumstances.       by various methods and procedures, there were more(prenominal) theories generated dealing with the content of humor episodes and sentence dependence. (Findings are nominate in the Findings /Results section below).Methods and Procedures To carry this study out, they used event history techniques in order to analyze humor attempts and successes. They did this apply groups of 6 people each. They further used their results with their insights on status and sensation to develop a new theory (talked about in the Background and Purpose section above). Once this theory was developed, they examined what they had from the additional data from the group discussions. Many ways that they came up with their findings in the research was by using bar graphs to plot their knowledge. Findings / Results In looking at the humor episodes, they set that a higher portion of mens than womens humor is differentiating, while a higher portion of womens t han mens humor is cohesion-building. A frequent claim is that men suppose more jokes than women and in describing feminine speech style, Robin Lakoff suggested in the abstract that women have no sense of humor, and also that they never effectively tell nor get jokes. They found that the gender/joking difference is noticeable in children by the young age of 6 years old. With time dependence, they found that there was a lot of it in humor use. They note the quantify is everything. As far as timing in conversation goes, and the purpose of the pressure value (humor releasing pressure/tension), Robinson and Lovin comment that the highest rates of humor then should be during that latter part of the conversation when