A drama in play format Essay

Gerald is not a member of the Birling family but he is lifelessness caught in their web of sin. He found Eva in a bar where he was hoping to pick up a fancy woman he found her in the clutches of Alderman Megarty. Alderman was harassing Eva. When Gerald, standardised her knight in shining armour, made Alderman go away, they started to talk and became fri block ups and eventually lovers. This all happened during the conviction that Sheila and Gerald were lovers. This is the largest part of the immoral act committed by Gerald, which was in feature not against Eva but against Shelia.Eventually he decided that their relationship had to culmination so he gave her some money and they went their separate ways. It is my belief that for a time Gerald and Eva were in love, as when it sinks in that she is dead he says, rapscallion 35 Sorry I well, Ive suddenly unfeignedised interpreted it in properly that shes dead. Gerald was the only member of the group to demonstrate some love a nd compassion to Eva. Later, Gerald appears to be indifferent to the wipeout of Eva oddly after the inspector has left and he believes it was all a hoax. sputum is in like manner shown to the fact that he sinned.Mrs Birling denied Eva benefits from a charity of which she was the chairman. This was for several(prenominal) reasons, but the main one was the fact that Eva fabricated a pretend when it was her turn to be interviewed by the charitys committee. Her name of filling was Mrs Birling, this was because it was Eric who had made her pregnant, and the real Mrs Birling obviously did not accredit this fact, and seemed to mean that Eva was personally insulting her. Eva in that respectfore received no benefits. This was a passing immoral act, as the members of the committee are not meant to be prejudice towards any appeal.Mrs Birling thought that what she did was acceptable because Eva had lied. However, it was in fact not a lie as it was Erics child, also a Mr Birling, and he did propose to marry her but she had refused, as she knew it would not work. Eric was in a bar one night and he got talking to Eva, he also got drunk. He then walked Eva home and forced himself upon her, scallywag 52 Well, I was in that state when a chap easily turns nasty. later she told him she was pregnant he began to steal money from his fathers descent to help her.This was the only unintentional act of cruelty to happen to Eva, as all the others were purposeful acts of cruelty. He was not cruel to her but still he brought her suffering. He was another member of the group actually touched by the events. As he seems to have been changed for the better by the death of Eva. The Inspectors name is Goole. Pronounced the same as the ghost, or ghoul. This makes me remember that he is a ghost or a nicety of some kind, sent to the Birling family to show them the errors of their ways.A lot like the ghosts of Christmas Past, Present and Future from Charles Dickens A Christmas Carol . He appears to know about Evas death before it has even happened perhaps he has some kind of sixth sense. He says towards the end of the third act, page 54 And my trouble is that I havent much time. Is this because he knows the real natural law volition briefly call the house to posit their questions? We know in retrospect that at this point there is no dead body at the mortuary, because Gerald Croft rings the mortuary to ascertain this soon after Goole has left.I do not believe that Inspector Goole is a real police inspector. His mannerisms are unlike those of a real police officer, although he does refuse a drink at the beginning, page 11 No thank you, Mr Birling. Im on duty. I think he says this because he is acting the role of a police officer. He becomes also emotionally involved in the situation a real policeman would keep the questioning on an official level. For example, he says to Mr Birling, page 46 Dont stammer and yammer at me again, man. Im losing all patience with you people. This story is told as a drama in play format.The end of each of the three acts, including the final one, is completed with a moment of suspense. The sense of hearing is left anticipating the next act, wondering what will happen. The audience also become emotionally attached to the characters and want to know whether Sheila and Gerald will remain engaged, they want to know what the Birlings will do with Eric, and will there be a public s gougedal? They are drawn in to the rights and wrongs of the characters actions, and they pass judgement upon Gerald and Erics behaviour, Mrs Birlings snobbery, Mr Birlings self righteousness.The audience listens to the moral of the story, that we are individuals in a society, who should smack after each other, and not be merely out for what we can get. The final few words of the play are unexpected. We have had the emotion that the Inspector is not all he seems, but now that the real police (presumably) have telephoned, things b ecome clearer. I wanted to see a continuation of the play, with real events, real police, and see how much the characters changed when faced with the education again.No doubt Sheila and Eric would approach the situation differently, they seem to have intentional a lesson from events. On page 70, Sheila says Everything we said had happened really had happened. If it didnt end tragically, then thats lucky for us. But it might have done. and on page 71 Youre pretending everythings just as it was before. She and Eric have moved on from their original viewpoints, and this gives us commit for the future, it is to be hoped that they would not behave so badly again in their future relationships with people. Unfortunately, we are unable to know the real ending.